Comparison of the effect of phenobarbital & levetiracetam in the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) as adjuvant treatment in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Infants who are born from mothers with substance use disorder might suffer from neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and need treatment with medicines. One of these medicines is phenobarbital, which may cause side effects in long-term consumption. Alternative drugs can be used to reduce these side effects. This study seeks the comparison of the effects of phenobarbital & levetiracetam as adjuvant therapy in neonatal abstinence syndrome. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed in one year from May 2021 until May 2022. The neonates who were born from mothers with substance use disorder and had neonatal abstinence syndrome in Afzalipoor Hospital of Kerman were studied. The treatment started with morphine initially and every four hours the infants were checked. The infants who were diagnosed with uncontrolled symptoms After obtaining informed consent from the parents were randomly divided into two groups and treated with secondary drugs, either phenobarbital or levetiracetam. RESULTS: Based on the obtained results, it was clear that there was no significant difference between the hospitalization time of the two infant groups under therapy (phenobarbital: 18.59 days versus Levetiracetam 18.24 days) (P-value = 0.512). Also, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of the frequency of re-hospitalization during the first week after discharge, the occurrence of complications, and third treatment line prescription (P-value = 0.644). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the obtained results, like hospitalization duration time (P-value = 0.512) it seems that levetiracetam can be used to substitute phenobarbital in treating neonatal abstinence syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The current study has been registered in the Iran registry of clinical trials website (fa.irct.ir) on the date 25/2/2022 with registration no. IRCT20211218053444N2.

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and Corresponding Pharmacotherapy Approaches from 2 University-affiliated Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Puerto Rico (2018-2020).

OBJECTIVE: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a set of drug withdrawal symptoms suffered by neonates exposed to drugs in utero. Several studies have widely described NAS incidence and treatment approach; however, little is known regarding the incidence and manifestations of this disease in Puerto Rico (PR). The principal aim of this study was to describe NAS incidence in the neonatal units of hospitals affiliated with the University of PR in terms of occurrence, clinical manifestations, and treatment approaches. METHODS: Our study evaluated the medical records of NAS babies diagnosed from 2018 through 2020 at 2 hospitals affiliated with the University of PR Medical Sciences Campus. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze trends. RESULTS: We identified 12 neonates diagnosed with NAS, 5 with low birthweights (<2500 g); for a NAS incidence of 2 cases per 1000 admitted for the 3 years of recollected data. The urine toxicology results revealed that 9 had experienced intrauterine polydrug exposure. Phenobarbital loading dose were determined on the day of diagnosis (indicated by Finnegan score). The first manifestation of NAS symptoms varied: 8 neonates showed symptoms within 48 hours after birth, whereas 4 had withdrawal symptoms within 72-120 hours of their births. Differences between dosing practices and guidelines were observed, ranging from a 0.69% to a 25% difference during treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Further research on the incidence of NAS in PR (national level) is needed for a deeper understanding that we hope will lead to the development of enhanced treatment protocols in PR.

Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome Following Prenatal Use of Supplements Containing Tianeptine.

Tianeptine is an opioid receptor agonist that is prescribed as an antidepressant in many countries. In the United States, tianeptine is not approved for medical use because of its potential for abuse and addiction. Nonetheless, products containing tianeptine are easily obtainable and are marketed as dietary supplements. There are increasing reports of adverse effects and fatal toxicities resulting from tianeptine use among adolescents and adults. This emerging public health threat could escalate the opioid epidemic and drive increased newborn perinatal exposure. The impact of in utero exposure to tianeptine has not been studied, and to our knowledge, the authors of only 1 report have documented possible neonatal effects. Here, we describe a case of chronic prenatal exposure to tianeptine in the setting of maternal dependence on dietary supplements. This infant developed signs of severe withdrawal shortly after birth that were refractory to treatment with oral phenobarbital but responded to subsequent oral morphine therapy. On further questioning, the mother revealed the use of a tianeptine-containing dietary supplement. We did not perform confirmatory toxicology testing because tianeptine is not assayed by usual urine drug screening tests. For infants with clinical signs of opioid withdrawal without known etiology, we suggest that the maternal interview should inquire about the use of neurotropic over-the-counter drugs.

Advances in the Care of Infants With Prenatal Opioid Exposure and Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.

A significant number of advances have been made in the last 5 years with respect to the identification, diagnosis, assessment, and management of infants with prenatal opioid exposure and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) from birth to early childhood. The primary objective of this review is to summarize major advances that will inform the clinical management of opioid-exposed newborns and provide an overview of NOWS care to promote the implementation of best practices. First, advances with respect to standardizing the clinical diagnosis of NOWS will be reviewed. Second, the most commonly used assessment strategies are discussed, with a focus on presenting new quality improvement and clinical trial data surrounding the use of the new function-based assessment Eat, Sleep, and Console approach. Third, both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment modalities are reviewed, highlighting clinical trials that have compared the use of higher calorie and low lactose formula, vibrating crib mattresses, morphine compared with methadone, buprenorphine compared with morphine or methadone, the use of ondansetron as a medication to prevent the need for NOWS opioid pharmacologic treatment, and the introduction of symptom-triggered dosing compared with scheduled dosing. Fourth, maternal, infant, environmental, and genetic factors that have been found to be associated with NOWS severity are highlighted. Finally, emerging recommendations on postdelivery hospitalization follow-up and developmental surveillance are presented, along with highlighting ongoing and needed areas of research to promote infant and family well-being for families impacted by opioid use.

Pragmatic, randomized, blinded trial to shorten pharmacologic treatment of newborns with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).

BACKGROUND: The incidence of maternal opioid use in the USA has increased substantially since 2000. As a consequence of opioid use during pregnancy, the incidence of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) has increased fivefold between 2002 and 2012. Pharmacological therapy is indicated when signs of NOWS cannot be controlled, and the objective of pharmacological therapy is to control NOWS signs. Once pharmacologic therapy has started, there is great variability in strategies to wean infants. An important rationale for studying weaning of pharmacological treatment for NOWS is that weaning represents the longest time interval of drug treatment. Stopping medications too early may not completely treat NOWS symptoms. METHODS: This will be a pragmatic, randomized, blinded trial of opioid weaning to determine whether more rapid weaning, compared to slow wean, will reduce the number of days of opioid treatment in infants receiving morphine or methadone as the primary treatment for NOWS. DISCUSSION: The proposed study is a pragmatic trial to determine whether a rapid-weaning intervention reduces the number of days of opioid treatment, compared to a slow-weaning intervention, and we powered the proposed study to detect a 2-day difference in the length of treatment. Hospitals will be able to use either morphine or methadone with the knowledge that we may find a positive treatment effect for both, one, or neither drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04214834. Registered January 2, 2020.

Effect of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Treatment Status and Maternal Depressive Symptomatology on Maternal Reports of Infant Behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of maternal perinatal depression symptoms and infant treatment status for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) on maternal perceptions of infant regulatory behavior at 6 weeks of age. METHODS: Mothers and their infants (N = 106; 53 dyads) were recruited from a rural, White cohort in Northeast Maine. Mothers in medication-assisted treatment (methadone) and their infants (n = 35 dyads) were divided based on the infant's NAS pharmacological treatment (n = 20, NAS+ group; n = 15, NAS- group) and compared with a demographically similar, nonexposed comparison group (n = 18 dyads; COMP group). At 6 weeks postpartum, mothers reported their depression symptoms Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition) and infant regulatory behaviors [Mother and Baby Scales (MABS)]. Infant neurobehavior was assessed during the same visit using the Neonatal Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). RESULTS: Mothers in the NAS+ group showed significantly higher depression scores than the COMP group (p < .05) while the NAS- group did not. Across the sample, mothers with higher depression scores reported higher infant "unsettled-irregularity" MABS scores, regardless of group status. Agreement between maternal reports of infant regulatory behaviors and observer-assessed NNNS summary scares was poor in both the NAS+ and COMP groups. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum women in opioid recovery with infants requiring pharmacological intervention for NAS are more at risk for depression which may adversely influence their perceptions of their infants' regulatory profiles. Unique, targeted attachment interventions may be needed for this population.

Characteristics and outcomes of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study in the current era.

OBJECTIVE: Compare Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS) in preterm and term infants. STUDY DESIGN: Single center, retrospective chart review of all in-utero opioid exposed infants born between 2014 and 2019. Withdrawal symptoms were assessed using Modified Finnegan Assessment Tool. RESULTS: Thirteen preterm (PT), 72 late preterm (LPT), and 178 term infants were included. Preterm and LPT compared to term infants had lower peak Finnegan scores (9/9 vs. 12) and received less pharmacologic treatment (23.1/44.4 vs. 66.3%). Similar onset, peak symptoms, and treatment duration was observed in LPT and term infants. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm and LPT infants have lower Finnegan scores and require less pharmacologic therapy for NOWS. It is unclear if this is because our current assessment tool does not capture their symptoms or if they truly have less withdrawal. Onset of NOWS is similar in LPT and term infant, thus LPT infants do not require prolonged hospital monitoring for NOWS.

Can umbilical cord testing add to maternal urine drug screen for evaluation of infants at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated maternal urine drug screen (UDS) at delivery and umbilical cord drug testing and its association with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) diagnosis and severity following opioid exposed pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 770 mother-infant dyads at five birthing hospitals in the United States Appalachian region for a five-year period was performed. Variables of interest included dyad demographics, results of maternal UDS at delivery and umbilical cord drug testing, and three neonatal outcomes: NOWS diagnosis, pharmacologic treatment administered for NOWS, and length of hospital stay (LOS) of the newborn. RESULTS: Opioid-positivity was between 8.5% and 66.3% based on maternal UDS at delivery or umbilical cord testing. Odds of NOWS diagnosis and increased infant LOS was best associated with opioid detection in maternal UDS alone (OR = 5.62, 95% CI [3.06, 10.33] and OR = 8.33, 95% CI [3.67, 18.89], respectively). However, odds of pharmacologic treatment for NOWS was best associated with opioid detection in both maternal UDS and umbilical cord testing on the same dyad (OR = 3.22, 95% CI [1.14, 9.09]). CONCLUSION: Maternal UDS is a better option compared to umbilical cord testing for evaluation of opioid-exposed infants and risk of NOWS diagnosis and increased infant LOS.

Evaluation of Administrative Data for Identifying Maternal Opioid Use at Delivery in Florida.

OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown significant increases in the prevalence of maternal opioid use. Most prevalence estimates are based on unverified ICD-10-CM diagnoses. This study determined the accuracy of ICD-10-CM opioid-related diagnosis codes documented during delivery and examined potential associations between maternal/hospital characteristics and diagnosis with an opioid-related code. METHODS: To identify people with prenatal opioid use, we identified a sample of infants born during 2017-2018 in Florida with a NAS related diagnosis code (P96.1) and confirmatory NAS characteristics (N = 460). Delivery records were scanned for opioid-related diagnoses and prenatal opioid use was confirmed through record review. The accuracy of each opioid-related code was measured using positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity. Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We found the PPV was nearly 100% for all ICD-10-CM opioid-related codes (98.5-100%) and the sensitivity was 65.9%. Non-Hispanic Black mothers were 1.8 times more likely than non-Hispanic white mothers to have a missed opioid-related diagnosis at delivery (aRR:1.80, CI 1.14-2.84). Mothers who delivered at a teaching status hospital were less likely to have a missed opioid-related diagnosis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: We observed high accuracy of maternal opioid-related diagnosis codes at delivery. However, our findings suggest that over 30% of mothers with opioid use may not be diagnosed with an opioid-related code at delivery, although their infant had a confirmed NAS diagnosis. This study provides information on the utility and accuracy of ICD-10-CM opioid-related codes at delivery among mothers of infants with NAS.

From 2010 to 2017, maternal opioid-related diagnoses at delivery increased by 100% in the US. Most prevalence estimates are based on unverified ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. Evaluations of maternal opioid-related diagnoses at delivery are extremely limited but essential for utilizing prevalence estimates generated from administrative data.

Prenatal Substance Exposure and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: State Estimates from the 2016-2020 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System.

INTRODUCTION: Estimating Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and prenatal substance exposure rates in Medicaid can help target program efforts to improve access to services. METHODS: The data for this study was extracted from the 2016-2020 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF) Research Identifiable Files (RIF) and included infants born between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 with a either a NAS diagnosis or prenatal substance exposure. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, the estimated national rate of NAS experienced a 18% decline, while the estimated national rate of prenatal substance exposure experienced a 3.6% increase. At the state level in 2020, the NAS rate ranged from 3.2 per 1000 births (Hawaii) to 68.0 per 1000 births (West Virginia). Between 2016 and 2020, 28 states experienced a decline in NAS births and 20 states had an increase in NAS rates. In 2020, the lowest prenatal substance exposure rate was observed in New Jersey (9.9 per 1000 births) and the highest in West Virginia (88.1 per 1000 births). Between 2016 and 2020, 38 states experienced an increase in the rate of prenatal substance exposure and 10 states experienced a decline. DISCUSSION: Estimated rate of NAS has declined nationally, but rate of prenatal substance exposure has increased, with considerable state-level variation. The reported increase in prenatal substance exposure in the majority of US states (38) suggest that substances other than opioids are influencing this trend. Medicaid-led initiatives can be used to identify women with substance use and connect them to services.

What is already known about the topic? Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and prenatal substance exposure are significant risk factors for poor neurodevelopmental and mental health outcomes in early childhood. NAS birth rates have been increasing in the US since 2000 and the majority of NAS births are covered by Medicaid.What this article adds? This article estimates national and state-level prenatal substance exposure and NAS rates among Medicaid-covered infants born between 2016-2020 using data from the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System. This is the first study using post-2017 data to estimate national NAS rates. The findings can inform future federal and state policy efforts to improve access to screening, diagnosis and treatment among pregnant women with substance use disorder and infants with NAS.

Assessing the clinical utility of toxicology testing in the peripartum period.

BACKGROUND: Toxicology testing is frequently used as a means of gathering objective data about substance use in pregnancy, but little is known about the clinical utility of testing in the peripartum setting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the utility of obtaining maternal-neonatal dyad toxicology testing at the time of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of all deliveries in a single healthcare system in Massachusetts between 2016 and 2020, and identified deliveries with either maternal or neonatal toxicology testing at delivery. An unexpected result was defined as a positive test for a nonprescribed substance that was not known on the basis of clinical history, self-report, or previous toxicology testing within a week of delivery, excluding results for cannabis. We evaluated the characteristics of maternal-infant dyads with unexpected positive results, unexpected positive results by rationale for testing, changes in clinical management after an unexpected positive test, and maternal outcomes in the year after delivery using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 2036 maternal-infant dyads with toxicology tests performed during the study period, there were 80 (3.9%) with an unexpected positive result. Diagnosis of substance use disorder with active use in the last 2 years was the clinical rationale for testing that yielded the greatest number of unexpected positive results (10.7% of total tests ordered for this rationale). Inadequate prenatal care (5.8%), maternal use of medication for opioid use disorder (3.8%), maternal medical indications such as hypertension or placental abruption (2.3%), history of substance use disorder in remission (1.7%), or maternal cannabis use (1.6%) yielded lower rates of unexpected results compared with a recent substance use disorder (within the last 2 years). Solely on the basis of findings from unexpected test results, 42% of dyads were referred to child protective services, 30% of dyads had no documentation of maternal counseling during delivery hospitalization, and 31% did not receive breastfeeding counseling after an unexpected test; 22.8% had monitoring for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Postpartum, 26 (32.5%) were referred to substance use disorder treatment, 31 (38.8%) attended a postpartum mental health visit, and only 26 (32.5%) attended a postpartum visit. Fifteen individuals (18.8%) were readmitted in the year after delivery, all for substance-related medical complications. CONCLUSION: Unexpected positive toxicology results at delivery were uncommon, particularly when tests were sent for frequently used clinical rationales for testing, suggesting a need to revisit guidelines surrounding appropriateness of indications for toxicology testing. The poor maternal outcomes in this cohort highlight a missed opportunity for maternal connection to counseling and treatment in the peripartum period.

A case-control study comparing rates and diagnoses of hospital readmission in infants affected by neonatal abstinence syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome/neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NAS/NOWS), a withdrawal syndrome from opioids and other substances resulting from intrauterine exposure, have been increasing exponentially in the U.S. To improve health outcomes, it is important to understand population health risks, including rehospitalization and related diagnoses, using current data. This study will compare and describe the rates of rehospitalization, the demographic characteristics and the rehospitalization diagnoses and age at diagnosis between the infants affected by NAS/NOWS to those sampled who were unaffected. This study will also describe the frequency of NAS/NOWS births per year along with a yearly comparison of readmissions in those affected by NAS/NOWS to those who were not (2016-2020). METHODS: Health claims data were used to conduct a case/control study. Diagnosis codes for neonatal withdrawal syndrome/NAS/NOWS (P04.49 or P96.1 and P96.1 alone) from 1 October 2015 to 1 June 2021 were extracted, and controls were case-matched based on month/year of birth. Rehospitalizations following birth and the related diagnoses were described and grouped using the Agency of Healthcare Research Quality Clinical Classifications Software Refined Frequency distribution. The chi-square test of association and generalized estimating equation modeling were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Infants affected by NAS/NOWS are 2.7 times more likely to have a rehospitalization. White, non-Hispanic neonates (OR = 1.5; p = .007) and those infants residing in rural areas (OR = 1.9; p < .001) were disproportionately affected. We identified a host of admission diagnoses with increased prevalence in infants affected by NAS/NOWS when compared to those who were not affected (e.g. infectious diseases, feeding disorders). CONCLUSIONS: Infants with NAS/NOWS are at increased risk of rehospitalization with a host of diagnoses, and specific demographic groups (White, rural) are more highly affected.

Adverse Maternal Experiences and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To propose a measure for adverse maternal experiences (AMEs) and examine if AMEs are independently associated with delivery of a neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) diagnosed infant. METHODS: Using the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) stressful life events questions, we constructed a composite measure of AMEs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of linked Birth Certificate Data, Hospital Discharge Data and PRAMS data for 2012-2018 using the composite measure. Our analytic sample included 6358 singleton deliveries. We calculated prevalence of NAS and AMEs and prevalence odds ratio (POR) for delivery of an NAS-diagnosed infant adjusting for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, pre-pregnancy depression, prescription medicine 12 months prior to pregnancy, and smoking during pregnancy. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of NAS in Delaware during 2012-2018 was 2.2% (95% CI 1.8-2.6); 9.5% (95% CI 8.7-10.2) of women reported AMEs. After adjustment, women with AMEs had 1.1 times greater odds (aPOR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3-3.3) to deliver a NAS-diagnosed infant as compared with women without AMEs. CONCLUSIONS: Although the cross-sectional nature of the study limits drawing any causal inferences, there are co-occurring factors that support plausibility of an association between AMEs and delivering NAS-diagnosed infants. Addressing AMEs, mental health and substance use screening and treatment as part of preconception and prenatal care may mitigate risks.

Risk of Feeding Problems Among Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The rate of infants born with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) increased by more than 500% between 2004 and 2016. Although feeding problems among infants diagnosed with NAS have been documented, the risk of feeding problems among infants diagnosed with NAS has not been estimated. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the extent to which feeding problems among infants diagnosed with NAS differ from thise in infants without an NAS diagnosis. METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY: A matched retrospective cohort study (2008-2017) of infants diagnosed with NAS in the United States was conducted using hospital admission data from the Cerner Health Facts Database. Multivariable logistic regressions controlling for confounders were used to assess whether an NAS diagnosis is associated with hospital admission due to feeding problems. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Infants with NAS were nearly 3 times as likely (OR = 2.81; 95% CI, 2.68-2.95) to have feeding problems compared with infants without NAS after adjusting for infant and hospital characteristics. Lower birth weight, higher infant age, Hispanic ethnicity, and hospital location in the Midwest region were also associated with higher odds of feeding problems. Infants diagnosed with NAS who had feeding problems had slightly lower odds of being offered lactation services than infants without NAS who had feeding problems. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings suggest the need for targeted feeding interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Future research on infants with NAS may build on these findings by assessing the role of maternal factors such as nutrition and substance use to understand how parental characteristics also influence the risk for hospitalization.

Accuracy of diagnostic codes for prenatal opioid exposure and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the accuracy of diagnostic codes in identifying Prenatal Opioid Exposure (POE) and Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS). STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of 374,222 mother-infant dyads with delivery from 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2019. We ascertained maternal diagnostic codes for opioid use during pregnancy and infant diagnostic codes for drug exposure and withdrawal. We assessed sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for POE and NOWS, defined using laboratory, pharmacy, and clinical data. RESULTS: Maternal codes had low sensitivity (36.4%) and PPV (34.7%) for POE. Infant codes for drug exposure were neither sensitive for POE (14%) nor NOWS (31.6%) and had low PPV. Codes for newborn withdrawal had low sensitivity (31.6%) for detecting NOWS, but high PPV (85%). Sensitivity improved (95.1%) for NOWS requiring pharmacologic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic codes identify POE and NOWS poorly. Improved case identification would include pharmacy and laboratory results, and clearly defined criteria for evidence of withdrawal.

Prediction model for nonopiate-induced neonatal abstinence syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) induced by opiate use is common worldwide. Psychiatric drugs are a more common cause of NAS in Japan but infants of mothers taking psychiatric medications do not always develop NAS. The purpose of this study was to develop a practical model for predicting the onset of nonopiate-induced NAS, using variables available at birth. METHODS: In this diagnostic study, prediction models were developed using multivariable logistic regression with retrospective data collected at our hospital between 2010 and 2019. The NAS diagnosis was based on the Isobe score, and maternal medications were converted to dose equivalents. RESULTS: A total of 164 maternal and infant dyads met the inclusion criteria; 91 were included in the analysis, of whom 29 infants (32%) were diagnosed with NAS. Final models were created with and without the drug indices. The model without the drug indices consisted of neonatal head circumference in z-scores and Apgar scores at 5 min < 9, and the model with the drug indices included these, as well as antipsychotics and hypnotics indices. The C-statistics were 0.747 (95% CI: 0.638-0.856), and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.683-0.907), respectively, indicating that the models possessed good predictive accuracy for NAS onset. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed models that predicted nonopiate-induced NAS accurately. They may be further improved through the use of drug indices.

Drug testing in support of the diagnosis of neonatal abstinence syndrome: The current situation.

Illicit drug use during pregnancy is a concern worldwide, with many international studies describing attempted strategies to mitigate this problem. Drug misuse during pregnancy is associated with significant maternal as well as perinatal complications, which include a high incidence of stillbirths, fetal distress, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and increased neonatal mortality. Unfortunately, the identification of a drug-exposed mother or neonate is challenging. Maternal disclosure of drug use is often inaccurate, principally due to psychosocial factors including behavioral denial or the fear of the consequences resulting from such admissions. Likewise, many infants who have been exposed to drugs in utero may appear normal at birth and initially show no overt manifestations of drug effects. Thus, the identification of the drug-exposed infant requires a high index of clinical suspicion. Conversely, analytical testing is an objective means of determining drug exposure when it may be necessary to document proof of the infant's exposure to illicit drugs. The review will discuss the different matrices that are most commonly used for testing (e.g., maternal urine, neonatal urine, meconium, and umbilical cord), the strengths and limitations for each matrix, which drugs and metabolites are appropriate for testing, the various testing methods, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Assessing Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome Severity as a Function of Maternal Buprenorphine Dose and Umbilical Cord Tissue Concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Infants born to mothers with opioid use disorder (OUD) and prenatally treated with buprenorphine have a significantly lower incidence of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), its treatment duration, and hospital length of stay compared with methadone. However, risk of NOWS remains and clinicians continue to lack an objective methodology to predict NOWS severity among these infants. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between buprenorphine exposure, umbilical cord tissue (UCT) concentrations, and NOWS development and severity. METHODS: A single-center retrospective observational cohort study from March 2018 through June 2020 of newborns exposed to buprenorphine in utero. Associations between quantified buprenorphine exposure, neonatal UCT concentrations, NOWS diagnosis, and severity were made using regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 24 mothers and 25 neonates were included. Length of maternal buprenorphine therapy (months) positively correlated to norbuprenorphine (r2 = 0.234, P = 0.019) and buprenorphine + norbuprenorphine UCT concentrations (r2 = 0.203, P = 0.031). A positive relationship was seen between active metabolite concentrations and cumulative morphine dose (mg/kg) for treatment of severe NOWS (r2 = 0.471, P = 0.007). A 0.36 ng/g buprenorphine + norbuprenorphine UCT (CI = 0.002-0.72, P = 0.049) equated in a 1-point increase in modified peak Finnegan score. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine UCT concentrations can allow for quantification of in utero fetal exposure and demonstrate an association with a longer duration of exposure with the severity and treatment of NOWS in exposed infants.

The Eat, Sleep, Console Method: A Literature Review.

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a significant public health problem in the United States. The most commonly used tool to assess and treat infants with NAS is the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS). The more recently developed Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) method simplifies assessment of NAS. Current research suggests promising outcomes with the ESC method in areas such as length of hospital stay (LOS) and amount of medication needed to treat NAS. A literature review was conducted to answer the following question: In newborn infants with NAS born at 36 weeks of gestation or older, does the ESC method reduce the use of medication and LOS when compared with the FNASS? All of the studies reporting on LOS and medication usage rates reported a decrease in both when moving to the ESC method from FNASS.